A skeleton argument is a document produced for the court. It is most usually produced as a means of presenting the skeleton or “bare bones” of a case before a trial. This gives the judge a brief synopsis of the relevant matters for the court to consider and also outlines both the agreed and disagreed issues between the parties. The detail of the arguments is heard before the court, orally during the trial or hearing.
If you need help structuring your arguments and evidence for the judge, you can use our free Court Statement Writer.
When might you need to use one?
Skeleton arguments are usually prepared for interim applications, contested hearings, final hearings and appeals. These will be prepared by a solicitor or barrister if you are legally represented. If, however, you are a litigant in person, then you might need to draft one yourself.
What should be included in a skeleton argument?
There is not a strict formula for a good skeleton argument but it would normally include the following:
1. Set out the nature of the submissions i.e. your case
The first section should include a summary of the order you are seeking and the Statute or Act the order falls under, for example, a residence order under s. 8 Children Act 1989.
2. State the background to the case
This should include a section of any relevant background to the case. This should only include information which is brief, concise and will assist the court. This section should also summarise what is agreed between the parties and what is disagreed e.g. “the mother wants this but the father wants this.”
An example might be: “The parents separated on [insert date]. At a hearing on [insert date] before [insert judge name] an order for contact in the interim was agreed. The mother's application for sole residence is not agreed.”
Find out exactly which court forms you need for your situation. Takes 30 seconds.
Try our Court Form Finder free, here on this site →3. Set out the points of law and authority
This section should set out any legal authorities or precedents you are relying on in your submissions. This is usually case law, where a similar case has been before the courts and you can use the same case to support your own. You should use the most recent case law that you can find.
4. Make any submissions of fact
This section would provide a brief outline of your main arguments. You should refer to facts supported in the evidence. This may be witness statements, CAFCASS reports, welfare reports and anything which is relevant and relates to any of the issues put before the court.
The way to refer to a report in the court bundle, for example, would be [C136 para 4] for a report contained within Section C of the bundle, at page 136, paragraph 4.
5. Summary setting out precisely what the court is being asked to do
The summary should set out exactly what you want the court to do, or in other words, what you request the court orders to do. For a father asking the court to grant shared residence, this may be that the father wishes for the children to reside with him and the mother on alternate weekends and for him to have the children each Wednesday and Thursday overnight, plus for half of all of the holidays. This should be captured within the summary.
Your situation may be slightly different. ask a question below ↓ and our editorial team will reply with our advice.
6. Reading list/cases
If there are any cases you are referring to within your submissions then it is wise to append a reading list and/or a copy of the cases to the skeleton. This helps to ensure that you make everything as easy as possible for the court. You should also, if possible, estimate the length of reading time that will be required. It is important to note that skeleton arguments do vary according to complexity of the issues.
Formatting, length, content and structure
There are a number of Practice Directions and guidelines in relation to formatting of the skeleton:
- The font should be Times New Roman in size 12.
- The line spacing should be set at 1.5, to make the text easier to read.
- Paragraphs should be numbered so that they are easily referred to.
- The left hand margin should be set to at least 2.5cm. When it is included into the court bundle, none of the text is covered when it is bound together.
- Include page numbers in the top right hand corner of each page, to correspond with the page numbering in the court bundle. This will again, make it much easier to refer the court to when making submission. This can be done in pencil so that if something else needs to be inserted, the page numbers can be amended.
Remember...
The skeleton should be as brief and concise as possible. Your submissions in the skeleton will be fleshed out when you are in court. It is not a substitute for oral argument. A skeleton should rarely exceed five pages. Use abbreviations where ever possible, but make sure that they can be understood by the court and the parties.
I would be most grateful for a skeleton argument sample for a successful application for child contact.
This follows an ex wife ignoring the courts by abusing a contact order & alienating my children.
Regards
Tony
My case is described as follows:
I was a nurse in charge of a night shift. when I started my shift, I realized that I should have one more staff to meet the clinical needs,: i.e: the shift was short staffed. I informed the responsible person but he did not remedy the problem. Further on, a direct seclusion check was due at 22.00 hrs, of which I informed him, but he stated that it had to be delayed due to shortage of staff and he had other priorities. He came for the direct seclusion check with one staff as response team while I requested for more staff, given the perceived risks of the agitated patient
As he was aware that there were no more staff available, he took the lead for the check and stated that we should go in with the minimum required staff of 3, discounting my request for more staff. As there was a required minimum of 3 staff, I could not challenge him in the absence of an appropriate risk management care plan. In the course of the direct check, the patient became physically aggressive and had to be restrained. He overpowered us and violently pulled me down. I hit my head on the floor and also sustained a rotator cuff tear in my right shoulder. I sustained head injury following which I was diagnosed with bilateral subdural hematoma after 3 montfhs. 3 months later the hematoma became significantly large and lifethreatening that I had to undergo a burr hole surgery. Now, in defence, the responsible person states that minimum of 3 staff dealing with the patient was appropriate. He has three people in higher management position corroborating his evidence but stating that they have given a generalised statement as they were not there at time of incident, whereas statement should have been taken from the other 2 staff who were on duty and could give a true statement of facts. Following head injury I was knocked unconscious as stated by direct witness and I was not actually deem fit to stay on duty. The responsible person failed to provide first aid or medical attention or report or escalate the facts of the incident to relevant parties for further actions. So, who is blame, what can I claim?
Ask Separated Dads a question
Ask our editorial team a question and we will reply with our advice. Tell us as much about your situation as you can: the more detail you give, the more useful our answer can be.
You do not need to use your real name. Please do not include your full address, phone number, email address, or the names of other people. We may edit or remove identifying details for privacy and legal reasons.
Comments are moderated before publication.