Home > The Court Process > Specific Issue Orders

Specific Issue Orders

Author: Lorna Elliott LLB (hons), Barrister - Updated: 3 June 2011 |
 
Specific Issue Order Court Child Family

Specific Issue Orders, much like the name suggests, are orders sought from the family court to determine a particular matter in connection with the exercise of Parental Responsibility. These orders can cover a wide range of issues that you and your ex-partner cannot agree on, such as:

        
  • Whether your child or children should change their name(s)
  • Decisions pertaining to their education
  • Whether they should have a particular medical treatment or operation
  • Whether they should receive religious or non-religious education
  • Taking the child to live abroad on a permanent basis
  • Preventing someone from having contact with your child

What the Court Will Do

As in all cases, the court’s main concern is the welfare of the child in question. The court will always put the child’s best interests first and this main issue will determine the outcome of any application for an order. Applications for a Specific Issue Order are heard before a judge and a representative from Cafcass (Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Services Officer), who is a qualified social worker. In the first instance, this meeting will endeavour to reach an agreement between the parents as to how to determine the issue. This needs the consent of both parents, which can often be impossible if there have been allegations of domestic violence.

Court's Discretion to Make Order of its Own Volition

It is important to note that a magistrate or judge may make a Specific Issue Order of their own volition. This is generally in situations in which the judge is satisfied that there is a risk that the parent in question may go ahead with a particular course of action without seeking the other’s consent. In other circumstances, and only if there are grounds to do so, the judge or magistrate may make a Specific Issue Order if the responsible parent is acting in an inappropriate way. This could relate to, for example, taking the child to places that are not deemed suitable for children, or leaving them in the care of a person who is unsuitable for childcare.

Directions For Hearing

If this meeting does not prove productive, the parents and the Cafcass officer, along with any solicitors representing either party, go before the District Judge or magistrates in order to obtain directions for a trial. Usually both parents submit witness statements, and the Cafcass officer (which could be the same person as before, but not necessarily) will then interview both parents and prepare a report. If possible, the Cafcass officer should see the child in the company of each of the parents.

Full Hearing

If the case then goes to a final hearing, each parent will give evidence in the Family Court and will be asked questions under oath by the opposing side. It is commonplace for the Cafcass officer’s report to settle matters before the final hearing happens and it is quite rare for a judge to find against the recommendations made in the report. If this happens, the judge must provide reasons for doing so. If the judge has made an error of law in coming to this decision, you can challenge the decision by way of judicial review. This is a complicated legal procedure, however, and you should always seek legal advice before embarking on such a claim. For more information, see the page on www.CourtroomAdvice.co.uk.

You might also like...
Comments...
Since when have the courts ever thought about what's best for the child. Its been clearly demonstrated for the last 35+ years that its always in the best interest of the resident parent, normally the mother. Never rely on what Cafcass say. They have recently scored 8/10 in OFSTED reports.8/10 being that they've FAILED 8/10, or in other words, only passed 2/10 specific items set within OFSTED. Both OFSTED and the Public Funding account dept state that CAFCASS 'Are not fit for the purpose'.CAFCASS RUIN CHILDRENS LIVES. THEY RUIN THE RELATIONSHIP THAT THE NON RESIDENT PARENT TRIES TO HAVE WITH THE KID(S).Avoid BIAS Cafcass AT ALL COSTS!
Dave D - 13 June 2011 @ 3:11 PM
Unfortunately the consequence of this article being written by a lawyer means that statements such as "As in all cases, the court’s main concern is the welfare of the child in question." are made when in reality the prejudice and ignorance of the judge can be the main determinants of the judgement. The judge may not be aware of the benefits to a child of a rich relationship with both parents, for instance, and may therefore make a judgement that is far from the best interests of the child. He may not bother to seek advice or the advice he receives from, for instance, Cafcass, may be equally misguided.
nigeldodd - 5 June 2011 @ 5:47 PM
Leave a Comment or Ask a Question...
Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Notify:
  Notify me by email when a response is posted
Validate:
Enter word:
FIND LOCAL ADVICE AND SUPPORT...
IN TOWN / POSTCODE:
Our Quick Links

Latest Comments
Also on Separated Dads...
Our Most Popular...
Add to my Yahoo!
Add to Google
Stumble this
Add to Twitter
Add To Facebook
RSS feed
You should seek independent professional advice before acting upon any information on the SeparatedDads website. Please read our Disclaimer.