A McKenzie Friend is someone who accompanies a litigant in Court to provide moral support. They may also take notes, help the litigant find the correct papers and give advice on questions to ask witnesses etc. They cannot however speak for the litigant, or run the case for them.
Before attending court with your McKenzie Friend, you'll need to ensure all paperwork is correctly filed using our free Court Form Finder.
McKenzie Friends arose from the 1970 divorce case of McKenzie v McKenzie. In that case, the husband was representing himself and wanted the help of someone who was not legally qualified in the English Courts. His request was refused. However on appeal, it was determined that having moral support in Court was part of being entitled to a fair trial under the European Convention on Human Rights. Any such assistants/supporters are therefore now referred to as 'McKenzie Friends'.
A McKenzie Friend Can:
- Give quiet advice on points of law to the litigant
- Advise the litigant on issues that they might want to raise in Court
- Suggest to the litigant questions that they might want to ask the other party or witnesses
- Help organise documents
- Take notes
A McKenzie Friend Cannot:
- Speak for the litigant
- Examine witnesses
- Address the Court (though the Judge may be prepared to hear from them if this would clarify an issue and assist in the swift administration of justice.)
- Attend a closed court unless they have prior permission from the Court.
- Sign Court documents on the litigant's behalf.
Will permission for a McKenzie Friend always be granted?
A judge will not usually refuse permission unless it's believed that allowing the McKenzie Friend would interfere with the administration of justice (such as if the McKenzie Friend constantly interrupts proceedings). However often the court will issue a warning to the litigant and McKenzie Friend first, before an outright refusal is made.
If the judge decides refuse permission for a McKenzie Friend, they must give reasons for doing so. Usually any refusal will be for a particular person to act as a McKenzie Friend rather than generally for the litigant to have any McKenzie Friend.
Check what legal rights you have as a separated father. Takes 2 minutes.
Try our Father's Rights Checker free, here on this site →Why has there been a recent increased demand for McKenzie Friends?
Traditionally, McKenzie Friends were family members or friends, there to provide moral support free of charge to the litigant. However there are some professional McKenzie Friends who charge for their assistance (but are still far cheaper than solicitors).
In April 2013, the government changed the rules in relation to legal aid. This meant that litigants no longer receive free legal assistance in most family law cases, including those relating to divorce, child contact and residence, and civil cases relating to debt, housing, immigration, welfare and employment.
The change in legal aid rules left many litigants who couldn't afford a lawyer with a simple choice; go to court on your own or hire a (far cheaper) McKenzie friend. The demand for professional McKenzie Friends has therefore increased.
How much do McKenzie Friends charge?
Typically, professional McKenzie Friends charge between £16 and £90 per hour, depending upon experience and qualifications.
Although their role is supposed to be limited, they are increasingly mirroring the service provided by qualified lawyers. For example, they are not allowed to conduct litigation, but there is really nothing to stop them advising a litigant (word by word) what to write in a document, in such a way that there is really no difference.
Your situation may be slightly different. ask a question below ↓ and our editorial team will reply with our advice.
Who are professional McKenzie Friends?
There seem to be two "branches" of McKenzie Friends:
- Professionals with experience of the legal system, such as former social workers, and police officers.
- Those with personal experience of the legal system having dealt with similar cases of their own.
Help or hindrance?
McKenzie Friends can improve access to justice by providing valuable support for litigants in person. Attending Court can be a daunting experience, particularly for those who have not been before, and so many litigants feel encouraged to have someone who has been in the situation before sit with them and reassure them.
Many judges have also commented that in the high-pressure environment of the courtroom, McKenzie Friends can actually help litigants to separate emotion from fact. By encouraging the litigant to focus on factual issues, they help litigants to better present their case and assist the Court to more swiftly deal with matters.
There is however a real worry that the provision of services as a McKenzie Friend is completely unregulated. Some (perhaps well-meaning McKenzie Friends) can provide poor advice to their client that actually harms their client's case. Poor legal advice can lead to a litigant losing a perfectly good case, which does not serve to assist the litigant's cause, or the administration of justice for any of the parties involved.
There are also concerns that McKenzie Friends often take advantage of vulnerable litigants (those without the funds to afford a lawyer, and often those with lower academic abilities who do not feel as comfortable setting out their own arguments). Unfortunately due to the nature of the role and the lack of regulation of the field, it is the more vulnerable or desperate litigant that will often be left with the cheapest and least effective advice.
Conclusion
McKenzie Friends can be a helpful moral support to litigants. However there are better and worse McKenzie Friends, and you often get what you pay for. Having a poor McKenzie Friend (as with a poor lawyer) is not a reason for a re-trial of an issue. However unlike with lawyers, McKenzie Friends are unregulated and usually not insured, meaning that you have no recourse if their advice is incorrect.
Therefore whilst your McKenzie Friend may offer you guidance, it is important to remember that it is your case and your opportunity to present your side of the dispute.
Me and my ex split 9 months ago
He had regular contact with our children (every other weekend )
He then started to be inconsistent with our children which he received numerous letters from solicitors requesting he kept regular contact as its was starting to affetc our children
My ex then started to make threats that he wouldnt return the children if he had them in his care
He turned up at the children's school demanding to take the kids an hour b4 school ended (he got told no as he had got an appointment fornthe children and was asked to leave )
He now has become pally with and old ex friend of mine (we fell out over her constantly leaving her kids with me while she went away living life to the full)
She has now made big friends with my ex and is attending court with my ex to fight for custody of my children
Bear in mind we've had years of friendship under our belts did everything together
I have a steps order in place that states the ex cannot mention mine or my children's names or anything about court whilst it still going through the courts system
Hes obviously broke this part of the steps order as hes told her everything in order tonget her on side and attend court
Can I have her removed under the rule of conflict of interest (as she was my close friend )
Also what grounds doni have in court as hes clearly been telling her about our personal court proceedings
I have been separated for 3 years, we have a joint home and 3 children. Until last month we have been sharing the house for the kids where i would go 1 or twice a week in the evenings and every Saturday. I share a studio flat with my girlfriend which is not suitable for us all to be in and for the moment it's all i can afford. Now the ex has got her self a boyfriend she has decided I can no longer visit the home to see the kids, I must take them out which has ended up in me seeing them a lot less as specially in the evenings I have no where to take them. I am about to apply for court proceedings to finalise the financials as I need a suitable place to have the kids on my days. All our money is tied into the family home, i know the court will favour the mother. My question is what chance do i have of managing to find a way for me to be able to purchase a small flat to house my kids? I can not currently afford to move as I have the solicitors fees looming every month and potentially a huge court fee as well. The ex also works full time so does have money coming in as well as my maintenance.
How will the court likely see this situation?
Thanks.
I attended a court hearing today as a McKenzie Friend to an elderly vulnerable couple who are neighbours of mine. A Mckensie Friend is not allowed to stand as a witness in a case. If the witness statement is valuable evidence then I would look at others that could stand as a Mckensie Friend. Neither is a Mckensie Friend allowed to address the court or ask questions, so for anyone thinking of being a Mckensie Friend for someone it is very important to go through the strategy to be used in court beforehand. Make clear notes in bullet points that can be easily followed, and take a notepad as a Mckensie Friend is allowed to give advice in this respect and can be very useful if the person you are supporting forgets a point or is asked an unexpected question. I hope this helps.
Helen x
Thank you :)
The matter commenced in the Family Proceedings Court and has been elevated to the County Court before a High Court Judge!
The Respondent mother is represented by a Solicitor. However, at the 2nd directions appointment, the Respondent decided to save legal fees and brought along a close friend who acted as a McKenzie Friend. The McKenzie Friend was not a 'trained' McKenzie Friend!
At the directions hearing I was represented by Counsel. In pre-court negotiations with the Respondent in the presence the McKenzie Friend and the CAFCASS Officer, Counsel asked the McKenzie Friend if she would be giving evidence at the final hearing. The McKenzie Friend stated she would NOT be giving evidence at any subsequent or final hearing.
Again in open court, before the court clerk, my counsel reitereated the concerns she had about the McKenzie Friend vis-a-vis the possibility of her giving evidence in any subsequent hearing. Counsel requested the court clerk to note that the McKenzie should only be allowed to be party to the proceedings and remain in the court room on the presumption that she would not give evidence at any subsequent hearing. On this basis the McKenzie Friend was allowed to remain in the Court room by the clerk.
As it transpires that the McKenzie Friend has now made two witness statements and intends to give evidence at the final hearing.
My question is very simple.
CAN A McKENZIE FRIEND BE ALLOWED TO ACT AS A WITNESS AND GIVE EVIDENCE IN THE SAME HEARING, ESPECIALLY BEARING IN MIND THAT SHE WAS INFORMED IN PRE-COURT NEGOTIATIONS & OPEN COURT, IN THE PRESENCE OF THE COURT CLERK, THAT SHE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO ACT AS A WITNESS?
Is it not fundamentally unfair to the applicant's case that a potential witness is aware of the confidential facts of the case? I also feel there is a conflict of interests here.
Are there any other reasons I can put forward to prevent the McKenzie Friend's evidence from being included in the trial bundle?
I have a directions appointment on 2 April 2015 to put my case forward to exclude the written and oral evidence of the McKenzie Friend.
I have researched high and low to see if there is any precedent to rule on this matter and have come across none. There is no guidance from the courts regarding this issue either.
Your help would be most appreciated.
Yours faithfully
Thanks
thanks.
We continue together.....
Stay strong.
Mark
Im back for the next contact hearing in four weeks, how do i object to her acting as a mcenzie mcenzie friend this time and get her stopped from coming into court.
Ask Separated Dads a question
Ask our editorial team a question and we will reply with our advice. Tell us as much about your situation as you can: the more detail you give, the more useful our answer can be.
You do not need to use your real name. Please do not include your full address, phone number, email address, or the names of other people. We may edit or remove identifying details for privacy and legal reasons.
Comments are moderated before publication.